Actor inks a day pact, signs face rights away

April 14th, 2014 by Karen Hao

Can you imagine unknowingly giving away the rights for your face?

9780762431991_p0_v2_s260x420Todd Duffey, aka: Chotchkie’s Waiter in Office Space, sued 20th Century Fox for using his face on both the book’s cover and one of the buttons, claiming false endorsement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1125(a), which grants a claim only if the defendant is using his likeness without permission. Here, Duffey signed a one-page Day Player Agreement with Cubicle Inc., the production company behind Office Space, which granted Cubicle “all rights throughout the universe” to Duffey’s performance. A federal court in New York has dismissed Duffey’s claim (thanks to The Hollywood Reporter Esq. for posting the decision) because his agreement granted the production company “all rights throughout the universe in and/or to all results . . .  including, but not limited to, the rights to. . . exploit in any manner. . .  any pictures, likeness or representations made hereunder, of Duffey.” Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Copyright, Film, Intellectual property

Comments: no comments

Poof! Teller wins judgment over ‘Shadows’

April 11th, 2014 by Valerie A. Roque

(Photo Credit: ShannaBarnarna)

 

Shazam — a federal court in Las Vegas has granted summary judgment in favor Teller (one of the master magicians who make up Penn & Teller) on his claim that Gerard Dogge’s YouTube video performances of The Rose and Her Shadow infringes the master illusionist’s copyrighted (and signature) act, Shadows.  (Thanks to Hollywood Reporter, opinion can be read here.) Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Copyright, Intellectual property

Comments: no comments

EU high court OKs steps to block infringement

April 10th, 2014 by Karen Hao

CJEUThe Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled that Internet Service Providers in Europe legally may block piracy sites. The decision came in a case involving Constatintin Film and Wega, two movie production companies that had sued UPC Telekabel, an ISP, to block access to the website kino.to, which illegally distributes copyright-protected material.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Copyright, Film, Intellectual property, International

Comments: no comments

In Big Easy, a big no to counterfeiter takedown

April 9th, 2014 by Kasia Campbell
Image Credit: WWE Wrestlemania.Blogspot.com

Image Credit: WWE WrestleMania.Blogspot.com

The WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.), like all big time entertainments like the NFL Super Bowl, College Football Championship games, and Beyonce concerts, suffers from counterfeit merchandise sales at its shows and live events. The WWE zealously has sought judicial orders permitting it to seize counterfeit goods and prevent their vending,  especially for its pay-per-view events like WrestleMania, SummerSlam, and the Royal Rumble. With its most successful such event upcoming, WrestleMania XXX at the Superdome in New Orleans,  WWE pulled out all stops to curb infringement on its intellectual property. But a federal court in Louisiana came off the ropes to block a proposed body slam of what WWE saw as prospective merchandise bootleggers and brand pirates (a tip of the hat to The Hollywood Reporter Esq. for posting the decision online). Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Copyright, Intellectual property, Sports, Television, Trademark

Comments: no comments

In Britain, teen angst, more over ‘Glee’ ruling

April 8th, 2014 by Erica Rose

Glee, the American TV show that has become a global hit by capitalizing on teen angst, is in the midst of its own high  legal drama in Britain where Gleeks breathlessly await a further High Court ruling and an appellate decision as to the pop series’ fate in the UK. This all traces back to a recent court case in which Comic Enterprises Ltd. prevailed  over 20th Century Fox Film Corp. in a suit over a trademark for The Glee Club. Comic Enterprises registered the mark in 2001 to cover the various entertainments it offers, this long before Fox’s show was so much as glitter in its creators’ eyes. The British company, which has said it sought to negotiate with the U.S. media monolith before the case ended up in the High Court, demonstrated a key element to persuade the judge to protect its mark: public- or wrong way- confusion, meaning the ordinary folk might think its comedy club was a show spin-off or somehow related to it. The court planned a later hearing to determine remedies.  Fox has said it will appeal the decision, which could keep the show off British TV for its sixth and final season and affect its  merchandising, ending up costing the media company even more beyond its legal fees, possibly to negotiate now with Comic Enterprises.

Posted in Intellectual property, Television, Trademark

Comments: no comments

50 Cent rings up partial win over hip hop site

April 6th, 2014 by Kasia Campbell

50 Cent v. World Star Hip HopWhen hip hop artist, 50 Cent, first hit the music scene, many joked about his name and thought he would not last. But it looks like the joke’s on them as “50” has risen to the top, turning his rap career into a business empire, including a record label and clothing line, both labeled G-Unit, and an entertainment company, Tomorrow Today Entertainment. So when World Star Hip Hop, a website dedicated to hip hop culture, used Jackson’s and other G-Unit member’s images and likenesses without permission, you better believe “50” was all over that.

The rap artist-actor, who is quickly becoming famously known by his birth name, Curtis Jackson, sued World Star for copyright infringement, violation of his publicity rights, and trademark infringement. The intellectual property at issue includes photos of Jackson and G-Unit members, Lloyd Banks and Tony Yayo, from their albums Beg for Mercy and Thoughts of a Predicate Felon, and the “G-Unit” trademark. The court granted summary judgment in part for Jackson on his copyright infringement claim and his right of publicity claim, however, the court found that issues of genuine facts exist under Jackson’s trademark infringement claim. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Copyright, Intellectual property, Music, Right of publicity

Comments: no comments

‘Oh, Really?’ Naughty judges and ‘Mother’

April 4th, 2014 by Valerie A. Roque

In ‘Oh, Really?’ the Biederman Blog’s editors — voracious consumers of all matters pop culture — cast a curious, skeptical, fun and smart end-of-the-week eye on popular productions, sharing their keen observations about legal matters these raise.

With tens of millions of TV viewers tuned this week to see the answer to the nine-year question posed by the series How I Met Your Mother, for judicious reasons it’s a good time to reflect on this show’s episode titled Twelve Horny Women. Sitcom lawyer Marshall Eriksen, as played by Jason Segel, should have a slam-dunk case but cannot get anywhere with the judge or jury because opposing counsel, his law school pal Brad Morris (portrayed by Joe Manganiello), flexes his sculpted muscles, flashes his pearly white smile, and lures the all-female-jury with romance novel good looks. He woos all in the courtroom with his story of heartbreak after being recently dumped by his longtime girlfriend.

And not even the judge can resist — he allows Brad to act in this manner and even encourages it.  In one scene, Brad drops his pen to the floor, and when he goes to pick it up, he does so by flaunting his back-side to the judge and jury, then, slowly and seductively picks the pen up.  A frustrated Marshall says, “Objection!” yet the judge, with a grin on his face, gleam in his eyes and flirtation in his voice, responds, “I’ll allow.” Really? Is such conduct permissible in court? Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Oh, Really?, Procedural, Television

Comments: no comments

Get it in writing? It’s a $1 million Geraldo tale

April 3rd, 2014 by Karen Hao

0201-Geraldo-Rivera-NJ-Senate-really-republican_full_600What happens as an actor if your agent leaves his agency? Do you go with your agent? Or are you considered an actor for the agency?

As the recent ruling shows in a New York state case involving William Morris Endeavor v.  Geraldo Rivera, a little bit of writing can be worth a lot — say, $1 million in commissions the agency said it was owed by the Fox television news host. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Television

Comments: no comments

Court tosses much of a ‘Curve’ claim

April 1st, 2014 by Valerie A. Roque

Baseball is back and with  opening day officially launched on Monday, fans of  the Detroit Tigers, Philadelphia Phillies and Seattle Mariners were not the only sports enthusiasts  with reason to celebrate. Warner Bros. scored a home run when a U.S. District Court in Southern California recently granted WB’s motion for summary judgment because plaintiffs Gold Glove Productions and writer Ryan Brooks had failed to meet their burden in showing that Brooks’ Omaha was substantially similar to Trouble with the Curve, written by Randy Brown and starring Clint Eastwood.  The court stated, “that any similarities between the two works are not protectable as a matter of copyright law.”  (Thanks to Loeb & Loeb, LLP., the court’s full opinion can be reviewed here.) Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Copyright, Film, Intellectual property, Sports

Comments: Comments Off

Legal love for ‘Somebody:’ Usher, the Biebs

March 30th, 2014 by Kasia Campbell
Image Credit: Fan Pop

Image Credit: Fan Pop

Out of all the legal troubles Justin Bieber has encountered in the past few months, well maybe the past year, he gets off the hook in at least one of them. The pop singer, who is now turning his fame from pop sensation into troubled-star (with legal run-ins over accusations of egg throwing, driving under the influence  and paparazzi smackdown)  can now be referred to as a copyright infringement victor. We can call this a thing, right?

You know that song we could not get out of our heads, nor stop dancing to, as much as we wanted to because we were too old to be listening to Justin Bieber? Actually, there were probably a couple of Bieb songs of that order but the tune at legal hand would be Somebody to Love? Bieber and Usher, born Usher Raymond IV, were sued over it by two men who claimed the international stars ripped off their song. The plaintiffs were rap artist, Devin Copeland, whose stage name is “Devin the Dude,” and songwriter, Mareio Overton. They claimed that three versions of Somebody by Bieber and Usher infringed on their similarly titled song. Defendant’s three versions are Bieber’s and Usher’s collaboration (“Bieber accused song”), Usher’s own version (“Raymond accused song”), and a remix of the Bieber accused song. Sorry Plaintiff, but you don’t get a cool and dramatic name for your song, yours is simply labeled, “Plaintiffs’ song.” Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Copyright, Intellectual property, Music

Comments: Comments Off

About Biederman Blog

This site is an academic activity of law students at the Biederman Entertainment and Media Law Institute. Founded in 2000, the Institute takes full educational advantage of Southwestern Law School's location in Los Angeles and its long history with and deep connections to the entertainment industry.